Federal Government Central Planning ... to the MAX

By Simon Black

Government's Confiscation (theft) of Wealth

Only government officials, its 'make-work' union slaves, and its cronies benefit!

RESTORE AMERICA! CUT GOVERNMENT 50%!

"The politicians only want power so they can 'serve' you."

"Extortion and thuggery are good things when they're called law!"

Larken Rose

Uncle Sam, the thief, taking citizens for a ride!!!
"I'm for a flat tax -- as long as the flat rate is zero.
The object is to get rid of big government,
not find a new way of financing it." Harry Browne

Uncle Sam is a THIEF!
SEE THIS AS INTERNET PAGE

May 7, 2015
Victoria, Chile

Boris and Svetlana were simple farmers back in the old Soviet era.

They grew grapes on Russia’s bountiful Caspian coast, dried them in the sun, and sold raisins according to the quotas set by the Committee.

Every year the Soviet Union’s Raisin Administrative Committee (RAC) would regulate production, often ordering farmers to destroy upwards of 40% of their crop in order to achieve some sort of bizarre, contrived equilibrium.

This adherence to the religion of central planning in the Soviet Union was so severe that even after the wall fell they couldn’t quite manage to divorce themselves from it.

In his book ‘The Company of Strangers,’ British economist Paul Seabright recounts a hilarious conversation he had just a few weeks after the breakup of the Soviet Union.

Seabright was speaking to the former director of bread production in St. Petersburg, who said:

"Please understand that we are keen to move towards a market system. But we need to understand the fundamental details of how such a system works. Tell me, for example: who is in charge of the supply of bread to the population of London?”

Seabright explained, of course, that no one is in charge of such things.

In the West we don’t have centrally planned Committees to regulate the supply of bread, raisin, milk, etc.

One would think.

But guess again, comrades.

Because Boris and Svetlana are actually Marvin and Laura Horne of Kerman, California.

And yes, the Raisin Administrative Committee really, truly does exist in the Land of the Free. I am not making this up.

This happens year after year: RAC bureaucrats centrally plan precisely how many raisins will be sold in the market.

All raisins exceeding that quota are confiscated and stockpiled by RAC, which in some years has amounted to as much as 47% of US raisin production.

Amazing.

Aside from the unconscionable conclusion that this constitutes outright theft, it also means that American consumers are paying more for groceries than they should be.

Naturally, raisins aren’t the only crops targeted by bureaucrats.

There’s the Potato Administrative Committee, Citrus Administrative Committee, and oodles of other New Deal-era committees to set food production quotas.

Marvin and Laura Horne really did take a stand.

About a decade ago they bucked the quota and took the bold step of selling all the raisins that they had grown.

And they really have been punished severely for it. The US Department of Agriculture assessed a $695,226.92 fine against the Hornes, not counting penalties, interest, and legal fees.

The Hornes took the matter to court. And believe it or not, this case has actually reached the Supreme Court.

But even there at the Pantheon of American Justice, the issue is still hotly contested.

It’s incredible that even the nation’s most enlightened legal scholars can’t unanimously see the absurdity (and unconstitutionality) of this system.

Editor's note:

There is an inherent tendency in all governmental power to recognize no restraints on its operation and to extend the sphere of its dominion as much as possible. To control everything, to leave no room for anything to happen of its own accord without the interference of the authorities--this is the goal for which every ruler secretly strives.
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism, p.67

But it only serves as further proof of how far things have fallen in the Land of the Free.

Congress is there to create the most absurd, destructive, and invasive laws imaginable.

Executive agencies are standing by to cram them down your throat at gunpoint.

And the courts can’t even recognize when theft is theft.

Under such a heavy yoke, I would respectfully submit to the Hornes that there are a lot of places in the world to grow raisins.

Or run a business. Raise your children in the way that you want. Choose what you can/cannot put in your own body.

Or just about anything else.

And do so with much more freedom and comfort, never again having to worry about Big Brother, the national debt, or the next destructive regulation to come your way.

The Global Offshore & Investment Master Class is focused on step-by-step and done-for-you solutions for things like using foreign structures to minimize, defer, or even eliminate your taxes, and how to grow your wealth with value investing and smart, safe, unconventional investment options.

Get your copy here.

Until Tomorrow,
Simon Black

Founder, SovereignMan.com

[Editor's Note: These 'committees' are just part of the corrupt US' "benevolent totalitarianism" (Bob Livingston). The US Dept. of Agriculture is one of several agencies with almost unlimited discretionary power whose decisions are expempt from judicial review. Many other agencies should be eliminated. If the CON gress can't see fit to ELIMINATE some of these tyrannical agencies, then the laws must be amended to cut budgets as well as explicitly and very specificly restrict the power of these Executive Branch agencies.]

See the following links for more information:

How to Be a Crook — Legally!

FROM Ghost Gunner: Leveling the Playing Field

Those who seek out positions of power tend to be paranoid, hypocritical wimps. Consider the issue of firearms. Politicians have many thousands of mercenaries (soldiers and "law enforcers") wielding all sort of deadly weapons--guns, tanks, missiles, drones, etc. Yet those same politicians pee themselves at the thought of the rabble owning semi-automatic rifles. From their twisted, elitist perspective, it's perfectly fine for them to swipe many billions of dollars from their subjects to spend on all manner of armaments, but if YOU want to possess a rifle, they think you should have to ask their permission, and register it, and make sure they always know what you own.

They also expect to be allowed to do things in secret, while claiming the right to spy on you and everyone else. As far as they are concerned, it's none of your business what they do, or what weapons they have, but it is their business to know everything that you do and everything that you have. Of course, they will pretend that their goal is to protect you from the "criminal element," but you'd have to be pretty dense to actually believe that. Why do you suppose they mostly whine about civilians having weapons that:

  1. are used in only a tiny percentage of actual crime, and;
  2. are the most effective types of weapon for resisting "government" aggression?

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. People who gravitate towards political office think they have the right to rule you. That's the job they applied for. And, of course, extorting you and bossing you around could be rather more difficult if you are better armed than their enforcers. So they hand out machine guns to their mindless thugs, but have tantrums about you having a 30-round magazine.

Karl Marx has achieved his goal.

VOTE: to legitimize your subjugation and slavery!

The Undeniable Truth

How USA Residents Are Screwed!

Federal Reserve Mandate: STEAL!

It Can't Happen Here!

Question the Right of Authority!

FROM The Crux

A new Congress has been seated, and it brings the prospect of perhaps, maybe, potentially, in a possible way doing something about the runaway federal deficits. And in other news, several New York area bridges are for sale, which you can acquire at a bargain price.

Excessive Spending Destroys!

Feds Have a Spending Problem — DO NOT RAISE THE CEILING!

Feds Have a Sewage Problem!

Becky Gerritson: "...government is out of control!" and
"...our representative government has failed us."

Police State: Orwell's Nightmare Is Reality!

10/23/14 FROM The Hill

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the IRS to detail under oath how some of former agency official Lois Lerner’s emails went missing, as well as any potential methods for recovering them.

Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. District Court in Washington gave the Internal Revenue Service exactly a month — until Aug. 10 — to file a report, which he demanded as part of a lawsuit from a conservative watchdog, Judicial Watch, against the agency.

Judicial Watch is seeking a wide range of documents from the IRS, including Lerner’s emails, as part of a Freedom of Information Act request. It has complained that the IRS didn’t tell it that the agency couldn’t recover all of Lerner’s emails from 2009 to 2011.

Sullivan cast his ruling as a compromise, and a potential way for Judicial Watch to get answers without the court wading any deeper into the matter. Judicial Watch had asked the court to potentially compel IRS officials to testify about the lost emails, through a process called limited discovery.

FROM Project to RESTORE AMERICA

The FairTax is a consumption tax unilaterally applied to all Americans at the same rate. For businesses, payroll taxes would no longer exist. Our exports would include a heavy tax for overseas buyers purchasing our products, while our imports would be cheaper for us to purchase. I'm not sure how this would affect GDP, as more information is necessary.

According to the FairTax website, "Under the FairTax, every person living in the United States pays a sales tax on purchases of new goods and services, excluding necessities due to the prebate." The prebate gives every legal resident household an "advance refund" at the beginning of each month so that purchases made up to the poverty level are tax-free.

So a family of four making something like $50,000/year should not have to pay taxes, thus preventing an unfair burden on low-income families. Since the FairTax eliminates both federal and payroll taxes, you get to keep your gross pay amount of each paycheck earned.

Why Do We Need Term Limits?

John Adams said, “Without [term limits] every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey”. That being said, here are some of the reasons we believe our country needs Term Limits.

  1. Term Limits can help break the cycle of corruption in Congress. Case studies show that the longer an individual stays in office, the more likely they are to stop serving the public and begin serving their own interests.
  2. Term Limits will encourage regular citizens to run for office. Presently, there is a 94% re-election rate in the House and 83% in the Senate. Because of name recognition, and usually the advantage of money, it can be easy to stay in office. Without legitimate competition, what is the incentive for a member of Congress to serve the public? Furthermore, it is almost a lost cause for the average citizen to try to campaign against current members of Congress.
  3. Term Limits will break the power special interest groups have in Congress.
  4. Term Limits will force politicians to think about the impact of their legislation because they will be returning to their communities shortly to live under the laws they enacted.
  5. Term Limits will bring diversity of people and fresh ideas to Congress.

Term limits for lawmakers: when is enough, enough?

[Editor's Note: If you want to get rich, i.e. advance from a low paying government bureaucrat job on the local or state level, THEN GET ELECTED TO THE US CONGRESS (House or Senate). Once you're elected, it's easy to steal from your campaign contributions or the Congressional budget allocated to your seat and staff. You can go on a government-funded junket with 'lavishly' paid expenses. The list of ways to steal from the government while in office is inexhaustible. There are only a few Congressmen who left Congress just wealthy instead of a multi-millionaire. Of course, there are several who arrived in Congress as multi-millionaires and don't need to steal from the government.]