Comey's criminal leak to his hyper-liberal, socialist friend that was released to NY Times probably caused the liberal Deputy Attorney General, Rob Rosenstein to
appoint a Special Prosecutor for investigating Russia's possible involvement in the 2016 election. Before his firing, Comey probably conveyed to Rosenstein that he
wanted Mueller (his BFF) to be the Special Counsel and that he [Rosenstein] will see the signal to appoint the prosecutor in the daily mainstream media. Based
on examination of evidence so far, the Russian colluders were Hillary and the DNC not Trump. Muellar is a case of a corrupt former FBI director who saw his future corruption hearings
because of his involvement with the Clintons. So, Obama appoints Comey to cover for Muellar's and the Clintons' corruption. Muellar, Comey, and the Clintons should be
investigated, not Trump's disproven implications. A lot of people made a LOT of MONEY on the Uranium One deal. What's the old phrase? FOLLOW the MONEY!
While the mainstream "fake news" may regard Comey's federal crime as a simple effort to inform the public, and the government may not care as much about leaks
as they did during WWII, the leaking of the location of troops or of an aircraft carrier during a declared war would result in the loss of life.
The question is why does government seemingly hide information behind the label of 'classified' or 'secret' or 'top secret'? Do such classifications enable government
employees to feel more important or feel as though they are a higher level or status than the average citizen? Labeling some information as 'classified' could be a method
used by government to just prevent the release of information even though it's not really 'classified' by the rules used to mark the information.
Developments from June, 2016 to 2018
Fired FBI Director James Comey received a copy of the
Steele dossier,
full of unconfirmed fantasies and some of the most unbelievable lies about President Trump, from
John McCain who had received the dossier earlier
from David Kramer. Comey used the dossier as "evidence" against Trump, and directed FBI agent Peter Strzok to get a FISA warrant to eavesdrop on the
Trump campaign for president. The goal was to learn the campaign's strategy against Hillary. If one reads the dossier, it becomes clear that assertions or
statements presented as facts are total lies. The FISA Court Judge became furiously angry at Comey for abusing the FISA warrant. If the Judge were
President, he would have fired Comey.
Dossier to Get FISA Warrant
It is 100% clear that Rod Rosenstein, a hyper-liberal, card-carrying Democrat (Socialist), appointed Special Prosecutor Muellar not because there is real
evidence against Trump that required an investigation, but to cover up Muellar's and Rosenstein's involvement in the Uranium One sale to Russia. What
beter way to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest than appointing one of the major players? Rod wanted to continue the "smear" as long as possible.
Jeff Sessions, Rod Rosenstein, Andy McCabe, and Peter Strzok should be fired immediately, and many more FBI agents and/or various other agency participants
in this conspiracy to prevent Trump's election to be identified by the Inspector General's report. CONgress must closely manage the IG and examine the coming
report very carefully and objectively.
Additionally, A new Special Prosecutor should be appointed by the new Attorney General to investigate Hillary and the Clinton Foundation because, this time,
there is real evidence (Pay-to-Play, Uranium One) that demands an investigation.
Lastly, I always thought that Citizens of the USA live in a free country defined by the Constitution, but Senator Rand Paul, R-Ky, is absolutely right when he
states the fact that all citizens are presumed innocent until proven guilty. If a deranged, highly subjective
'True Believer' FBI agent can get a FISA warrant with the appearnce of evidence only, then this country is doomed. While CONgress and the DOJ claim
that Title II of the Patriot Act (a very disingenuous acronym), i.e., FISA, is good for fighting terrorism, I think it should be repealed entirely.
Donald J. Trump IS the winner of the 2016 presidential election against 'Crooked Hillary', who got richer while appointed to Sec. of State, despite the DOJ's
(other agencies to be identified) CONSPIRACY to prevent his election.
It's rather strange today that estimates show fully 30% of all elected officials and government employees would NOT have passed a Background Check for the offices held
if employment application forms of the 1950s through the 1970s were used today. The federal government is riddled with appointees and employees who are risks to national security leaking
secret information and forming alliances with potential enemies who are only prevented from attacking America by our armed forces. These federal elected officials and employees
are supported by some organizations that threaten America's Constitution and our entire way of life. The future with 50% of Millenials indicating that they favor Socialism and
Collectivism over Capitalism and Individualism is bleak.
Venezuela(also)
is experiencing, right now, the effect of Socialism that the Millenials (and AntiFa) ignorantly feel is so desirable. If one argues against Socialism, then the Socialist will ridicule and verbally
abuse you, but the arguer will not hear a viable counter to his view from the Socialist.
While politics, in general, is and has been the source of really dirty tricks and salacious rumors, Democrats appear to be the nastiest of all along with the
Establishment Republicans and RINOs in the Senate led by the greatest progessive RINO of all, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. If one has power, one will do anything to maintain that
power. Fortunately, U.S. Senators and Representatives can be removed from power in elections.
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." � Winston Churchill
"If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain." � Winston Churchill
[Editor's Note: I might replace the word 'liberal' in the last quote with 'Marxist'
to fit today's liberal who subverts every move by Americans that want to maintain our freedom.]
Recommendations
I recommend two (2) movies for interested viewers. If Democrat voters (or any voter) want to understand what is wrong with their
party, I recommend a documentary movie that contains a completely corroborated history of the Democrat Party. The documentary's title is:
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party. The documentary was produced by Dinesh D'Souza who was 'railroaded' by the Obama Administration into a
kangaroo court controlled by a corrupt judge and sentenced to prison for producing another documentary,
2016: Obama's America. All FACTS presented in these documentaries are the historical evidence of the failure of the Democrat Party although the Democrats have many allies that support these Communist/Socialist attempts to destroy
America, and no group of FAKE NEWS companies can deny the FACTS.
While America has a Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech, it doesn't guarantee an everyday political education. If Americans believe in their freedoms guaranteed by the
Bill of Rights, if Americans believe that Capitalism is the greatest creator of individual wealth the world has ever experienced (historical facts prove this assertion), then Americans
should know the people and organizations who want to destroy America from within. Therefore, the best documentary available that exposes and identifies these enemies who have grown
much stronger since the Russian Revolution is The Enemies Within.
Also near the end of The Enemies Within documentary, the video requests that citizens call their Senators and Representatives (those NOT affiliated with the Muslim
Brotherhood and other subversive Marxist organizations) to support
S. 68: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017 and
H.R. 377: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017.
After watching the video, you will clearly understand why the Muslim Brotherhood is trying to destroy America from within. Many current Representatives and Senators are affiliated with persons
and organizations whose precepts, behavior, and speech are as Marxist as Vladimir Lenin without identifying themselves as Marxist. One of these organizations has infiltrated America like a final
stage cancer. These un-American organizations must be excised like a massive tumor. This is NOT McCarthyism since you will SEE and UNDERSTAND the evidence presented in the video.
"The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history." —George Orwell
Anyone who believes this country is free is an idiot!
Justice Department: Comey�s Leak to New York Times was Unauthorized, Compares to Wikileaks
There are too many contradictions and curiosities in the James B. Comey affair for it to stay covered up forever.
This week we announced that the Justice Department is now comparing former FBI Director Comey to WikiLeaks. After Comey was fired by
President Trump on May 9, 2017, he gave the New York Times a February 14, 2017, memorandum written about a one-on-one conversation he had with President Trump regarding
former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
We are asking a federal court to order the release of all Comey�s unclassified memoranda about his one-on-one conversations with the
president.
Comey
testified under oath
before the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that he authored as many as nine such memos about
his one-on-one conversations with President Trump. He also
admitted, regarding
the �Flynn� memo, �I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter [for The New York Times] � I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the
appointment of a special counsel.� The New York Times published a report about the memo on May 16, 2017. Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed the following day.
On June 16, 2017, we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the
Department of Justice failed to respond to a May 16 FOIA request (
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:17-cv-01189)). Judicial Watch seeks:
FBI Director James Comey�s February 14, 2017 memorandum � memorializing an Oval Office conversation he had with the President on that
date regarding former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
In our lawsuit we refute the Justice Department�s claim of exemption for law enforcement purposes:
Ex-Director Comey plainly did not use the February 14 Memo for any recognized or legitimate law enforcement purpose. He used it to settle
a score with the President, who had just fired him.
We argue that if disclosure of the �Flynn� memo would harm the Russia investigation, then the Justice Department should have taken steps to
�address Ex-Director Comey�s removal of the memo from the FBI, leaking of the memo to the media, and subsequent testimony about the memo, to the extent that testimony was
unauthorized and not coordinated with [the Justice Department], the FBI, and/or Special Counsel Mueller. Removal of government records is a federal offense.�
While the Justice Department compares Comey to WikiLeaks, it makes no claim to have addressed Comey�s misconduct. We point out that its �failure to do so further undercuts any
claim of harm� to an ongoing law enforcement investigation.
On September 7, 2017, we
filed
another FOIA lawsuit on behalf of the Daily Caller News Foundation after the Department of Justice failed to respond to a June 9 FOIA request (
Daily Caller News Foundation v. U.S. Department Justice
(No. 1:17-cv-01830)). The lawsuit seeks:
All unclassified memoranda authored by former FBI Director James Comey that contemporaneously memorialized his discussions with
President Donald Trump and his aides [during] the time frame�November 8, 2016 to May 9, 2017.
In the Daily Caller News Foundation suit Judicial Watch
argues that neither the FBI
nor the Justice Department prevented Comey from testifying, nor do they dispute anything he said. Comey is not under investigation for violating any non-disclosure agreements or
removing records from the FBI when he was fired. �Their silence and inaction speak volumes,� Judicial Watch argues.
We further debunk the notion that Comey wrote the memos for law enforcement purposes:
[Director Comey] explained, �I knew that there might come a day when I would need a record of what happened, not just to defend myself,
but to defend the FBI and � and our integrity as an institution and the independence of our investigation.� � He authored the records not for law enforcement purposes but for
administrative and institutional purposes. His testimony could not be clearer.
We argue in both filings against withholding the memoranda under the guise of a national security exemption: The FBI fails to demonstrate that
material contained in the memoranda was classified through proper procedures.
In its
court filing opposing the release, the Justice Department also asserts that some of the Comey memos contain classified material. Both
cases have been consolidated in (Cable News Network, Inc., v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 1:17-cv-01167)).
�The Freedom of Information Act was designed to give the American people access to the records its government keeps,� said Neil Patel,
publisher and CEO of the Daily Caller News Foundation. �This access is fundamental in a democracy like ours. Today, when so many Americans feel detached from a government that
they feel often doesn�t serve their interests, this sort of access is more important than ever. When the Daily Caller News Foundation made a reasonable request for access to FBI
Director Comey�s memos we were completely stonewalled. Our request is legally sound and completely within the public interest so with the help of our friends at Judicial Watch we are
fighting in court to see it through.�
We are happy to help our friends at the Daily Caller News Foundation!
And we now have Justice Department confirmation that Comey was wrong to have leaked records to the media to settle a score with President
Trump. How can this Justice Department defend its position that memos written for the pernicious purpose of targeting a sitting president with a criminal investigation should remain
secret? Mr. Mueller may have an interest in protecting Comey, but the public�s interest demands transparency about Comey�s vendetta against President Trump.
We Sue DOJ Over Comey�s Controversial Senate Testimony
What did James Comey know, what were his intentions, and with whom did he discuss them, before his controversial testimony to the Senate?
This week, we filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for all records of communications
relating to former FBI Director Comey�s testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. (
Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice
(No. 1:17-cv-02316)).
We sued after the Justice Department failed follow federal law and respond to an August 14, 2017, FOIA request seeking:
All records of communications between the Department of Justice and former FBI Director James Comey prior to and regarding Comey�s
testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on June 8, 2017.
Fox News
reported:
�A source close to James Comey tells Fox News the former FBI director�s Senate testimony has been �closely coordinated� with Robert Mueller, whom the Justice Department appointed as special counsel
to oversee the Russia investigation.�
As discussed above, Comey gave testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, in which he admitted he leaked one of the
memos in order to get a special counsel appointed to target President Trump.
In his testimony Comey detailed multiple conversations with President Trump. Comey confirmed he told President Trump three times that he
was not a target of investigation and testified about President Trump�s firing of him.
Indeed, on May 16, 2017, The New York Times
reported
that it received a leaked memorandum from former Director Comey detailing a conversation between President Trump and Comey regarding the FBI�s investigation of potential Russian interference
in the 2016 United States presidential election.
Mr. Comey may have violated the law in leaking these memos to the media. It would be a scandal if Comey coordinated his Senate
testimony with Mr. Mueller�s special counsel office. That we have had to sue in federal court speaks volumes.
We are pursuing numerous additional FOIA lawsuits (see
here,
here,
here, and
here)
relating to former Director Comey�s memoranda and FBI exit records.
We also sent Acting FBI Director Andrew G. McCabe a warning letter concerning the FBI�s legal responsibility under the Federal Records Act
(FRA) to recover records, including memos Comey subsequently leaked to the media, unlawfully removed from the Bureau by former Director James Comey.
We will keep pushing for the truth about what looks to be the scandal of the century.
[Editor's Note: It is hoped that my
theory about appointees and government employees is proven
wrong, but I doubt it. For decades government has failed to create an environment that emphasizes transparency, and, further, the good sense to get out of the economy and people's business so that
the economy can thrive. The only reason for secrecy in government is to hide from the American people their gross neglegence and massive daily errors. No government official cares about doing a good
job, and if they fail, they can always cover it up.]
16 May 2017 - Judicial Watch Sues for FBI Records on UK �Trump Dossier� and Obama Wiretapping
13 Oct 2017 - No, say it isn't so! Hillary colluded with Raissians (Chuck Grassley spelling)!
8 Dec 2017 - JW's Chris Farrell exposes Muellar Team's Subversion, Incompetence & Bias
23 Nov 2017 - The Latest Clinton Scandals in Review!
Joseph Story, Supreme Court Justice ... when the court wasn't part of the L-E-J Cabal
Joseph Story (1779�1845) was born during the American Revolution, and came of age in the early years of the new United States of America. He was a scholar of the U.S. Constitution, and, eventually helped found the Harvard Law School.
In 1811, Story was appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison — who knew a few things about the U.S. Constitution, in that he helped write it. Story was a contemporary of another famous member of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Marshall (1755�1835).
"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
See the following links for more related articles:
[Editor's Note: what I have dubbed the "Legislative-Executive-Judicial Cabal" which the American People have caused by ignoring the generational transition from our Constitutional Republic to what now is, in effect, an "elected" dictatorship. Never mind who is elected. Never mind which bogus party is in power. The superficial, theatrically staged, choreographed appearance of debate, disagreement, and stalled legislation always resolves into more government and less FREEDOM. We the People still lose more freedom after every "emergency" or unnoticeably when CON-gress passes another general, open-ended law that enables the Executive (dictator) and its unaccountable agencies to formulate more freedom-restricting regulations (200 pages a day get posted to the Federal Register). The "Dictator's" agencies (police force) continue to pile-up more weapons to squelch uprising(s) when the People finally realize and understand their tyrannical government.
Currently, CONgress is just a group of socialists, progressives, and faux-conservatives (career politicians) that, on a daily basis, ignores the Constitution, many of their own past statutes, and cedes their responsibilities to the president ("elected" dictator). A comparison to the history of Rome becomes more and more credible with the Executive and its "featherbedded" lackeys gaining more power while CONgress sits back all fat-dumb-and-happy.
CONgress has made recent efforts to expose State Dept. failures in Benghazi (inept political leader), Fast-and-Furious gun-running (criminal AG), IRS 1st amendment violations, gov't union Veterans Administration fraud, and whining about Obama(Reid)-killer-Care, but these efforts are mostly politics as usual. Most "citizens" will forget about these infringements from our unaccountable, uncontrollable Executive branch with its tyrannical agencies staffed by socialist unions that extort "juicy" contracts from the "elected" dictatorship.
Most positions in the federal government whether elected, appointed, or hired are nominal, make-work jobs (confidentially) designed merely to grow government, bilk money from private businesses and citizens, and eventually fully transform America into a totalitarian state. When this happens, CONgress will have destroyed the economy and the country by their negligence and counter-liberty policies, and it will be almost impossible to Restore America. The 'Restore America' list is only a beginning too.]
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
James Madison, Federalist Paper 47, Friday, February 1, 1788
Anyone who believes this country is free is an idiot!
"Extortion and thuggery are good things when they're called law!"
Larken Rose
[Editor's Note: a Constitutional Convention is required to reverse the damage to freedom and liberty since 1900. This Article V was ratified by the participants at America's founding Constitutional Convention as an alternate path for repairing damage to freedom and liberty, a path for the People to restore damage caused by our failed representatives in the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of a government designed to represent the wishes of We the People.
The States must "demand" a Convention and explicitly specify an agenda of:
laws to be repealed or modified,
Amendments to existing constitutional clauses that define the co-equal branches to further specify and define, and
new Amendments or statutes to be eventually ratified by States.
These Amendments should further specify and clarify the powers of the Legislature and Executive Branches. A good example is the definition of a "Bill".
A Bill should contain ONLY verbiage in regards to the topic of the future law. NO earmarks and NO unrelated sections or attacments.
Many past Bills sent to a president for signature contained unrelated but essential funding sections that rendered the Bill veto-proof when it warranted a veto.
CON-gress can override a veto if the Bill is deemed absolutely necessary by CON-gress.
If the Bill requires SPECIFICALLY related amendments, the CON-gress can "debate" (with its usual theater) and vote any new amendments.
The original text of the Constitution contains some very GENERAL clauses enabling both CON-gress and Executive branches to write laws and
regulations with their particular nuances expanding powers beyond intent. "Intent" may be gleaned from a complete understanding of
Federalist Papers.
An example of further specification and clarity for CON-gress should be a clear, very specific definition of the boundaries for the interstate Commerce Clause.
To restore freedom, liberty, and individuality - minimally these must be repealed:
Currently, even with computer-searching systems, the list of antiquated and/or obsolete statutes (and related regulations) is unwieldy.
These statutes must be invalidated unless there remains an applicable reason for retaining the law(s).
Aside from invalidating statutes, there are many regulations that are biased in favor of large enterprises (who buy support from bureaucrats)
at the expense of the competition, effectively repressing the Free Market. Any regulations not related to public safety that gives a financial advantage
to some companies over their smaller rivals must be rescinded to enable all companies with good consumer products to excel without burdensome regulations.
Additionally, the Convention should adopt for ratification at least these new Amendments or statute modifications:
clearly define and limit the role of government in regards to the term "general welfare",
Term Limits for CON-gress (12 years) including a 6 month limit on time residing in DC,
strict Prohibition of Lobbying (with a comprehensive definition of "lobbying"), and
a Balanced Budget Amendment to stop wreckless spending. During a CON-gressionally declared "war" (only after USA is attacked or attack is proven "imminent"),
deficit spending is permissible.
Restore America to its roots, i.e. Defense, State, Treasury, and Justice. Some Agencies are required like CIA and NSA, both respectively focused on defense against real foreign aggressors and not fictitious paranoid delusions of war mongers. Other agencies help where certain interstate communications are necessary. Most agencies like Agriculture, Education, DEA, IRS (eliminated with 16th Amendment) and many other listed here should be eliminated.
Restore the world Gold Standard with five contentious steps, and
Replace the IMF, World Bank, and Export-Import Bank with facilities that reflect the new Gold Standard, and
After decentralizing and economizing, if tax revenue is needed to fund all or part of the federal government, then implement the Fair Tax.
Regarding a Constitutional Convention itself, some of the available literature warns the reader about a possible "unstructured" and "mismanaged"
Convention that might propose and adopt amendments that could damage the Republic.
Possible, however, it is difficult to envisage how much more damage could done over what the L-E-J Cabal has already done.
If the Convention's agenda and rules of order strictly prohibit violation of the rules and enable a vote on unlisted Amendments AFTER all others are adopted,
then the Convention will be properly structured and managed. ]
John Adams said, �Without [term limits] every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey�. That being said, here are some of the reasons we believe our country needs Term Limits.
Term Limits can help break the cycle of corruption in Congress. Case studies show that the longer an individual stays in office, the more likely they are to stop serving the public and begin serving their own interests.
Term Limits will encourage regular citizens to run for office. Presently, there is a 94% re-election rate in the House and 83% in the Senate. Because of name recognition, and usually the advantage of money, it can be easy to stay in office. Without legitimate competition, what is the incentive for a member of Congress to serve the public? Furthermore, it is almost a lost cause for the average citizen to try to campaign against current members of Congress.
Term Limits will break the power special interest groups have in Congress.
Term Limits will force politicians to think about the impact of their legislation because they will be returning to their communities shortly to live under the laws they enacted.
Term Limits will bring diversity of people and fresh ideas to Congress.
[Editor's Note: If you want to get rich, i.e. advance from a low paying government bureaucrat job on the local or state level, THEN GET ELECTED TO THE US CONGRESS (House or Senate). Once you're elected, it's easy to steal from your campaign contributions or the Congressional budget allocated to your seat and staff. You can go on a government-funded junket with 'lavishly' paid expenses. The list of ways to steal from the government while in office is inexhaustible. There are only a few Congressmen who left Congress just wealthy instead of a multi-millionaire. Of course, there are several who arrived in Congress as multi-millionaires and don't need to steal from the government.]
CONVENTION of STATES (CoS)
CONVENTION of STATES
BECOME a MEMBER-PARTICIPANT of CONVENTION of STATES here.
Get into the Action; Get information. Join here.
The CONgress (by
Article V of the Constitution) has proposed and
States have ratified many new amendments to the Constitution, some that increase their power over us citizens. CONgress can propose amendments, and the
alternative method to CONgressional proposals can come from States via
Article V. When "We the People" — meaning
a very large majority — are opposed to Acts of CONgress like the INCOME TAX or ENDLESS WARS or the FEDERAL RESERVE, Acts that restrict and regulate our
LIBERTY, Acts that are a waste of money, Acts that have caused unrecoverable indebtedness, then through local representaatives of our States WE can propose
Amendments to be ratified by States just like CONgress.
STATES and the PEOPLE of America are very angry at the federal goverment's violation of its
constitutionally-defined boundaries. States created the federal government in 1787 with LIMITED powers defined in the Constitution. All powers not
given by States to the feds remain with the States by Article X. The feds have through deceit, distortion, and falsification rearranged the entire contractual agreement
between States and the federal government. The feds have become a very powerful, all consuming force in American government. The time has come for States to rein in the federal government,
to take power back, to limit the federal government's power, and to add some detailed restriction to the definition of CONgress, the Executive, and the Judiciary.
In 1787 a central government was (is) necessary only to provide for the common defense and ensure equality
under the law for all Citizens, to provide a final arbiter for the resolution of unsolvable problems among States and People. Most laws and regulations that the federal
government has wreaked on the States and the People are unconstitutional. States are independent, sovereign countries who realized the need for a limited and defined
central government to prevent wasteful duplication of effort. The federal government, in 2017, is OUT OF CONTROL, infringing and interfering with State sovereignty and their
separate economies. A problem arose in 2012 with Arizona's attempt to secure their border with Mexico. An article is
here. States can prevent infringements
by the federal government with an Aricle V Convention of States to not only reverse past federal government "power grabs" but prevent future federal government
violations of their Constitutionally-defined boundaries.
A new, well-organized group of volunteers in all 50 states have gathered to restore America to
its roots by limiting all 3 branches of the federal government with a
Convention of States (CoS) organization (alternate site,
CoS Action). This is a Convention of States to AMEND the Constitution — NOT rewrite it!
Recently, CoS held an Article V, Convention
simulation with appointed volunteers from all 50 States. The simulated Convention demonstrated how a well-organized CoS can vote for proposed amendments
to the Consitution that are popular enough to be ratified by the necessary 3/4ths of States (38). Obviously, only proposed Amendments that are likely to pass
both Houses of the legislatures of thirty-eight (38) States, that is, the required 3/4ths of States to ratify an Amendment to the Constitution should be proposed.
See the Final Report here.
The purpose in a Convention of States, simulated or real, is to PROPOSE AMENDMENTS that give power back to the People. The proposed amendments must reflect the
thinking, objectives — the goals of people of States — who want to restore our Constitutional Republic to one that represents the people.
ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!
ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!
ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!
A real CoS, requires that 2/3rds of States (34) send an "application" to CONgress requesting that
CONgress schedule a CoS. State Legislatures are composed of an Assembly and Senate. Each "house" must pass a bill separately and send the resolution to their
Governor. Then the State sends an "application" to the CONgress. When the federal CONgress receives applications from 34 States, the CONgress is required to set a date for
the Convention of States. CONgress is NOT involved otherwise. The States have the Convention, propose amendments, and dispatch the precisely worded amendments to
their respectives assemblies and senates for ratification. CONgress only schedules the Convention.
,
full of unconfirmed fantasies and some of the most unbelievable lies about President Trump, from
Dossier to Get FISA Warrant
