Democrats (Socialists): the New Arbiter of Morality

One behaves "morally" as long as their actions don't threaten the Democrat Party's unethical and immoral behavior.

Governor William J. Le Petomane: "We've gotta protect our phoney baloney jobs, gentlemen!"
Blazing Saddles, 1974

See American Thinker Document below

Throughout the history of the Democrat Party since 1829, the Party's elected officials and operatives have one obvious strategy — they say, propose, or promise many actions — and later, when citizens' attention is focused elsewhere, Democrats will either do the opposite of their proposal or the implementation of their promise will be much weaker. Democrats establised the Ku Klux Klan, an American hate and murder group. Democrats have voted against every attempt by Republicans to equalize the citizenship status of all Americans. Democrats have passed immigration laws that allow uneducated, impoverished foreigners to emigrate to the USA. Because of the emigrant's initial political ignorance of the USA and their lack of education and financial self-reliance, Democrat Party operatives groom them to vote for Democrats in elections and promise financial support that never happens.

Today in 2019, Democrats rely on an uninterrupted stream of uneducated, impoverished, financially impactful people who bring children, crime, and drugs across the USA's southern border with impunity because of the Democrats previously established inept and incompetent immgration laws. When President Trump attempts to solve the problem by, first, building an impenetrable WALL to stop the flow of Illegal Aliens, an almost senile, beat-up old political hack (fighting against Democrat Party's young-and-dumb True Believer Socialists) who is an ineffective, back-stabbing, sycophant Speaker of the House brands the WALL as "immoral". Inanimate things cannot be immoral, but misbehaving people like the Speaker can.

IT IS AN ABSOLUTE, IRREFUTABLE FACT THAT WALLS WORK, and the first task should be to stop the flow of Illegal Aliens, drug and human traficking, and murders and other violent crimes caused by Illegals once they are on American soil. After stopping the flow, the feds can address the 25 million Illegals already here with a mass deportation. Then, CONgress must repeal existing Immigration statutes, pass a new law requiring educated, financially self-reliant, functionally English-speaking emigrants ONLY in the future who are given five years to become a naturalized citizen or be deported to their country of origin.

Recommendations

I recommend two (2) movies for interested viewers. If Democrat voters (or any voter) want to understand what is wrong with their party, I recommend a documentary movie that contains a completely corroborated history of the Democrat Party. The documentary's title is: Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party. The documentary was produced by Dinesh D'Souza who was 'railroaded' by the Obama Administration into a kangaroo court controlled by a corrupt judge and sentenced to prison for producing another documentary, 2016: Obama's America. All FACTS presented in these documentaries are the historical evidence of the failure of the Democrat Party although the Democrats have many allies that support these Communist/Socialist attempts to destroy America, and no group of FAKE NEWS companies can deny the FACTS.

Professor Carol Swain, Poli. Sci. & Law, Vanderbilt U. for Prager University
Professor Swain appears in one segment of Dinesh D'Souza's aforementioned video.

While America has a Constitution that guarantees freedom of speech, it doesn't guarantee an everyday political education. If Americans believe in their freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, if Americans believe that Capitalism is the greatest creator of individual wealth the world has ever experienced (historical facts prove this assertion), then Americans should know the people and organizations who want to destroy America from within. Therefore, the best documentary available that exposes and identifies these enemies who have grown much stronger since the Russian Revolution is The Enemies Within.

Also near the end of The Enemies Within documentary, the video requests that citizens call their Senators and Representatives (those NOT affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and other subversive Marxist organizations) to support S. 68: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017 and H.R. 377: Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2017. After watching the video, you will clearly understand why the Muslim Brotherhood is trying to destroy America from within. Many current Representatives and Senators are affiliated with persons and organizations whose precepts, behavior, and speech are as Marxist as Vladimir Lenin without identifying themselves as Marxist. One of these organizations has infiltrated America like a final stage cancer. These un-American organizations must be excised like a massive tumor. This is NOT McCarthyism since you will SEE and UNDERSTAND the evidence presented in the video.

"The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history."
George Orwell

 

Anyone who believes this country is free is an idiot!

RESTORE AMERICA! CUT GOVERNMENT 50%!

See the block below subtitled CONVENTION of STATES

"The politicians only want power so they can 'serve' you."

"Extortion and thuggery are good things when they're called law!"

Larken Rose

CONVENTION of STATES

BECOME a MEMBER-PARTICIPANT of CONVENTION of STATES here.
Get into the Action; Get information. Join here.

 

FROM
Beware the Morality of the Democrats

By Jeffrey T. Brown, February 3, 2019

The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of �morality.� They declare �immoral� anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it�s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?

Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left�s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats� efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.

While the Democrats don�t actually care about true morality, they know you do. The very people that Democrats smear and belittle constantly as hate-filled bigots are usually self-critically evaluating their own actions and beliefs on an ongoing basis. Most normal people have been raised, or choose of their own accord, to avoid behaving unethically or immorally in relation to fundamental objective principles of right and wrong. At least, that used to be largely so.

They do not depend on politicians or activists to guide them, but look instead to a just God whom they believe morally guides them to behave with honesty and goodness. They act in ways that they believe preserve their souls, and those with whom they interact, for the eventual judgment of God. They do not believe in or practice seeming honesty and goodness toward some, while practicing virulent rage and hatred toward others. Morality is not a political sliding scale. The God of moral people is not a political party or political philosophy. Those are instruments of subjective power, making them invalid instruments of subjective justice. Raw political power, manifested in dominating and subjugating largely voiceless people to a political future of servitude to the state, is not a wellspring of morality.

Indeed, to behave morally is often the antithesis of self-interest. Because morality is about what is right, rather than what is subjectively most advantageous for the decider, true morality requires self-denial. It requires considering the welfare of others and the suffering of others, as those will flow from one�s actions, and placing the interests of others over one�s own when to do so is morally right. This is not social justice, or socialist justice, but moral justice. This cannot be accomplished by those given to lie about their underlying greed or self-interest, or even about how what is best for them might coincidentally be good for others when that is not their purpose.

Americans animated by actual morality make hard choices every day, even if subconsciously, not because their political affiliation or social justice colleagues will demand that they be punished if they do not but because their own souls and those of others matter to them. They care more about behaving ethically and morally than dominating. What the left calls morality a sane person sees as often-vicious intimidation driven by hyper-emotional hatred cultivated to crush others. Politically driven actors cannot owe elective fealty to a corrupt political machine, which commits objectively immoral acts and promotes policies that destroy lives, and still pretend to be moral.

Against this history, which has become increasingly portentous over decades, it is a wonder that any decent person would still entertain the possibility that the accusation of a Marxist Socialist Democrat is worthy of five seconds of thought as to its validity. In even making the accusation, the Democrats betray the cynicism of their propaganda. They tap the morality of decent people to trick them into thinking that their morality is the problem, at least when compared to the new group morality of Marxists who will say and do anything to seize total political control over millions who would not otherwise trust them to give correct change.

It defies logic to entertain the accusation of immorality from those who know that the unborn are human children, but gleefully promote their murder anyway. They lie with an ease that is both fascinating and horrifying. Their corruption is limitless, and their capacity for dishonesty is monumental. They are the embodiment of soulless cynicism, masquerading as care and concern for what is moral, knowing all the time that their words and deeds are false and poisonous. One is left to wonder how such people can even pretend to morality while practicing such evil.

The answer is simple. They, unlike moral people, do not believe in a God from whom true morality and accountability derives. Removal of God from the Democrat platform was no accident. They are perfect heirs to their atheistic Socialist and Communist forefathers. Their sense of justice is crass and corporeal rather than spiritual. Their ethics are determined by what best serves their illicit drive for power here and now, regardless of who must pay with pain and heartbreak for their gain. For them, morality permits countless rapes of women and girls trying to come here at their invitation. Socialist morality permits vast death and destruction of the lives of innocent people caused by an open border. Drugs, gangs, criminals, terrorists, all are morally acceptable in Socialist secular theology, because the lives and safety of others are irrelevant. What matters is how many new illegal Democrat voters will be enabled in our near future to negate the voices of citizens, and vote Democrats into totalitarian power in perpetuity.

For this objective, Democrats will say anything. It is up to truly moral people to stop listening to their lies and stop asking themselves whether they are moral people when powerful Democrats try to shame them. If anything, the disapproval of Democrats is a sign you are on the right track. Do not be conned when they gaslight you about what is moral. They care about making you their servants by whatever immoral means they can. Gone are the days when most Democrats in positions of authority could be considered Americans like many of the rest of us, or even remotely interested in the well-being of the United States. They serve themselves and their agenda. They are not only disinterested in the well-being of the country, but are actively working against it. They are in America, but are no longer of it.

If you really want to ponder morality, ask yourself this: What has been the fate of those who challenged previous totalitarian regimes on truly moral grounds? They were re-educated, or worse. There is no place for morality in an atheistic power cult. Don�t be fooled by those who insist that your morality should conform to theirs. Listen to your soul, and keep fighting back.

[Editor's Note: The existence of any all-powerful god and/or such concepts as Heaven and Hell cannot be proven. One who has learned what is right and what is wrong and is certain that there is NO god, can behave as a good, moral, socially acceptable person who harms no one except in absolutely necessary self-defense. A moral, socially acceptable person and an Atheist are not mutually exclusive.

Likewise, one can behave in a self-interested fashion to achieve goal(s) without being immoral or unethical. If one competes with greater knowledge that composes a better idea and implementation plan all along behaving ethically and morally, then there is nothing wrong with that set of behaviors. True Capitalist behavior is necessarily a self-interested behavior that when performed ethically and morally can benefit all of mankind. ]

THE MOST ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF
THE NUMBER AND COST OF ILLEGAL ALIENS
ON USA SOIL:



FROM
Let's Shrink the Illegal Alien Population and Save Billions at the Same Time

November 28, 2018

FROM
Births to Legal and Illegal Immigrants in the U.S.

Octobber 9, 2018

 

FROM U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) Data on Federal Convictions


FROM The Crux

A new Congress has been seated, and it brings the prospect of perhaps, maybe, potentially, in a possible way doing something about the runaway federal deficits. And in other news, several New York area bridges are for sale, which you can acquire at a bargain price.

Excessive Spending Destroys!

Feds Have a Spending Problem — DO NOT RAISE THE CEILING!

Feds Have a Sewage Problem!

DEBT PERSPECTIVE!

Social Security (SS) monies flow into the Feds via paycheck withholding. The Feds buy US Treasuries and the Bond purchase money is deposited into the treasury. Benefit money must therefore be paid out of the Treasury. If there had been a SS brokerage account (instead of the Feds spending it), the monies could have been invested very conservatively to receive a modest 5-8% annual return on investment and the SS "Trust" Fund would be solvent even with retiring baby-boomers. Another mismanagement failure is SS Disability which has been defrauded by mendacious citizen malingerers especially from 2000 to 2016.

Joseph Story, Supreme Court Justice
... when the court wasn't part of the L-E-J Cabal

Joseph Story (1779�1845) was born during the American Revolution, and came of age in the early years of the new United States of America. He was a scholar of the U.S. Constitution, and, eventually helped found the Harvard Law School.

In 1811, Story was appointed to the Supreme Court by President James Madison — who knew a few things about the U.S. Constitution, in that he helped write it. Story was a contemporary of another famous member of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Marshall (1755�1835).

In 1833, Justice Story published a study titled, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. In a discussion of the Second Amendment, Story stated:

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."

See the following links for more related articles:

[Editor's Note: what I have dubbed the "Legislative-Executive-Judicial Cabal" which the American People have caused by ignoring the generational transition from our Constitutional Republic to what now is, in effect, an "elected" dictatorship. Never mind who is elected. Never mind which bogus party is in power. The superficial, theatrically staged, choreographed appearance of debate, disagreement, and stalled legislation always resolves into more government and less FREEDOM. We the People still lose more freedom after every "emergency" or unnoticeably when CON-gress passes another general, open-ended law that enables the Executive (dictator) and its unaccountable agencies to formulate more freedom-restricting regulations (200 pages a day get posted to the Federal Register). The "Dictator's" agencies (police force) continue to pile-up more weapons to squelch uprising(s) when the People finally realize and understand their tyrannical government.

A Convention of States is necessary to amend the Constitution for Congressional Term Limits to twelve (12) years and restrict time in DC to only six (6) months per year. Such an Amendment is only a FIRST step in restoring America to its Constitutional roots. Back in the day when the People still feared kings, the president's term was limited by Constitutional Amendment.

Currently, CONgress is just a group of socialists, progressives, and faux-conservatives (career politicians) that, on a daily basis, ignores the Constitution, many of their own past statutes, and cedes their responsibilities to the president ("elected" dictator). A comparison to the history of Rome becomes more and more credible with the Executive and its "featherbedded" lackeys gaining more power while CONgress sits back all fat-dumb-and-happy.

CONgress has made recent efforts to expose State Dept. failures in Benghazi (inept political leader), Fast-and-Furious gun-running (criminal AG), IRS 1st amendment violations, gov't union Veterans Administration fraud, and whining about Obama(Reid)-killer-Care, but these efforts are mostly politics as usual. Most "citizens" will forget about these infringements from our unaccountable, uncontrollable Executive branch with its tyrannical agencies staffed by socialist unions that extort "juicy" contracts from the "elected" dictatorship.

Most positions in the federal government whether elected, appointed, or hired are nominal, make-work jobs (confidentially) designed merely to grow government, bilk money from private businesses and citizens, and eventually fully transform America into a totalitarian state. When this happens, CONgress will have destroyed the economy and the country by their negligence and counter-liberty policies, and it will be almost impossible to Restore America. The 'Restore America' list is only a beginning too.]

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

James Madison, Federalist Paper 47, Friday, February 1, 1788

Anyone who believes this country is free is an idiot!

RESTORE AMERICA! CUT GOVERNMENT 50%!

"Extortion and thuggery are good things when they're called law!"

Larken Rose

[Editor's Note: a Constitutional Convention is required to reverse the damage to freedom and liberty since 1900. This Article V was ratified by the participants at America's founding Constitutional Convention as an alternate path for repairing damage to freedom and liberty, a path for the People to restore damage caused by our failed representatives in the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of a government designed to represent the wishes of We the People.

The States must "demand" a Convention and explicitly specify an agenda of:

  1. laws to be repealed or modified,
  2. Amendments to existing constitutional clauses that define the co-equal branches to further specify and define, and
  3. new Amendments or statutes to be eventually ratified by States.

These Amendments should further specify and clarify the powers of the Legislature and Executive Branches. A good example is the definition of a "Bill". A Bill should contain ONLY verbiage in regards to the topic of the future law. NO earmarks and NO unrelated sections or attacments.

Many past Bills sent to a president for signature contained unrelated but essential funding sections that rendered the Bill veto-proof when it warranted a veto. CON-gress can override a veto if the Bill is deemed absolutely necessary by CON-gress. If the Bill requires SPECIFICALLY related amendments, the CON-gress can "debate" (with its usual theater) and vote any new amendments.

The original text of the Constitution contains some very GENERAL clauses enabling both CON-gress and Executive branches to write laws and regulations with their particular nuances expanding powers beyond intent. "Intent" may be gleaned from a complete understanding of Federalist Papers. An example of further specification and clarity for CON-gress should be a clear, very specific definition of the boundaries for the interstate Commerce Clause.

To restore freedom, liberty, and individuality - minimally these must be repealed:

  1. the 16th Amendment,
  2. the Federal Reserve Act,
  3. the War Powers Act,
  4. all Asset Forfeiture laws,
  5. the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)
  6. the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act
  7. NDAA
  8. Homeland Security which includes TSA
  9. the Dodd�Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
  10. most Eminent Domain laws, and
  11. the Affordable Care Act

Currently, even with computer-searching systems, the list of antiquated and/or obsolete statutes (and related regulations) is unwieldy. These statutes must be invalidated unless there remains an applicable reason for retaining the law(s).

Aside from invalidating statutes, there are many regulations that are biased in favor of large enterprises (who buy support from bureaucrats) at the expense of the competition, effectively repressing the Free Market. Any regulations not related to public safety that gives a financial advantage to some companies over their smaller rivals must be rescinded to enable all companies with good consumer products to excel without burdensome regulations.

Additionally, the Convention should adopt for ratification at least these new Amendments or statute modifications:

  1. clearly define and limit the role of government in regards to the term "general welfare",
  2. Term Limits for CON-gress (12 years) including a 6 month limit on time residing in DC,
  3. strict Prohibition of Lobbying (with a comprehensive definition of "lobbying"), and
  4. a Balanced Budget Amendment to stop wreckless spending. During a CON-gressionally declared "war" (only after USA is attacked or attack is proven "imminent"), deficit spending is permissible.
  5. Restore America to its roots, i.e. Defense, State, Treasury, and Justice. Some Agencies are required like CIA and NSA, both respectively focused on defense against real foreign aggressors and not fictitious paranoid delusions of war mongers. Other agencies help where certain interstate communications are necessary. Most agencies like Agriculture, Education, DEA, IRS (eliminated with 16th Amendment) and many other listed here should be eliminated.
  6. Restore the world Gold Standard with five contentious steps, and
  7. Replace the IMF, World Bank, and Export-Import Bank with facilities that reflect the new Gold Standard, and
  8. After decentralizing and economizing, if tax revenue is needed to fund all or part of the federal government, then implement the Fair Tax.

Regarding a Constitutional Convention itself, some of the available literature warns the reader about a possible "unstructured" and "mismanaged" Convention that might propose and adopt amendments that could damage the Republic. Possible, however, it is difficult to envisage how much more damage could done over what the L-E-J Cabal has already done. If the Convention's agenda and rules of order strictly prohibit violation of the rules and enable a vote on unlisted Amendments AFTER all others are adopted, then the Convention will be properly structured and managed. ]

Why Do We Need Term Limits?

John Adams said, �Without [term limits] every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey�. That being said, here are some of the reasons we believe our country needs Term Limits.

  1. Term Limits can help break the cycle of corruption in Congress. Case studies show that the longer an individual stays in office, the more likely they are to stop serving the public and begin serving their own interests.
  2. Term Limits will encourage regular citizens to run for office. Presently, there is a 94% re-election rate in the House and 83% in the Senate. Because of name recognition, and usually the advantage of money, it can be easy to stay in office. Without legitimate competition, what is the incentive for a member of Congress to serve the public? Furthermore, it is almost a lost cause for the average citizen to try to campaign against current members of Congress.
  3. Term Limits will break the power special interest groups have in Congress.
  4. Term Limits will force politicians to think about the impact of their legislation because they will be returning to their communities shortly to live under the laws they enacted.
  5. Term Limits will bring diversity of people and fresh ideas to Congress.

Term limits for lawmakers: when is enough, enough?

[Editor's Note: If you want to get rich, i.e. advance from a low paying government bureaucrat job on the local or state level, THEN GET ELECTED TO THE US CONGRESS (House or Senate). Once you're elected, it's easy to steal from your campaign contributions or the Congressional budget allocated to your seat and staff. You can go on a government-funded junket with 'lavishly' paid expenses. The list of ways to steal from the government while in office is inexhaustible. There are only a few Congressmen who left Congress just wealthy instead of a multi-millionaire. Of course, there are several who arrived in Congress as multi-millionaires and don't need to steal from the government.]

 

CONVENTION of STATES (CoS)

CONVENTION of STATES

BECOME a MEMBER-PARTICIPANT of CONVENTION of STATES here. Get into the Action; Get information. Join here.

The CONgress (by Article V of the Constitution) has proposed and States have ratified many new amendments to the Constitution, some that increase their power over us citizens. CONgress can propose amendments, and the alternative method to CONgressional proposals can come from States via Article V. When "We the People" — meaning a very large majority — are opposed to Acts of CONgress like the INCOME TAX or ENDLESS WARS or the FEDERAL RESERVE, Acts that restrict and regulate our LIBERTY, Acts that are a waste of money, Acts that have caused unrecoverable indebtedness, then through local representaatives of our States WE can propose Amendments to be ratified by States just like CONgress.

STATES and the PEOPLE of America are very angry at the federal goverment's violation of its constitutionally-defined boundaries. States created the federal government in 1787 with LIMITED powers defined in the Constitution. All powers not given by States to the feds remain with the States by Article X. The feds have through deceit, distortion, and falsification rearranged the entire contractual agreement between States and the federal government. The feds have become a very powerful, all consuming force in American government. The time has come for States to rein in the federal government, to take power back, to limit the federal government's power, and to add some detailed restriction to the definition of CONgress, the Executive, and the Judiciary.

In 1787 a central government was (is) necessary only to provide for the common defense and ensure equality under the law for all Citizens, to provide a final arbiter for the resolution of unsolvable problems among States and People. Most laws and regulations that the federal government has wreaked on the States and the People are unconstitutional. States are independent, sovereign countries who realized the need for a limited and defined central government to prevent wasteful duplication of effort. The federal government, in 2017, is OUT OF CONTROL, infringing and interfering with State sovereignty and their separate economies. A problem arose in 2012 with Arizona's attempt to secure their border with Mexico. An article is here. States can prevent infringements by the federal government with an Aricle V Convention of States to not only reverse past federal government "power grabs" but prevent future federal government violations of their Constitutionally-defined boundaries.

A new, well-organized group of volunteers in all 50 states have gathered to restore America to its roots by limiting all 3 branches of the federal government with a Convention of States (CoS) organization (alternate site, CoS Action). This is a Convention of States to AMEND the Constitution — NOT rewrite it! Recently, CoS held an Article V, Convention simulation with appointed volunteers from all 50 States. The simulated Convention demonstrated how a well-organized CoS can vote for proposed amendments to the Consitution that are popular enough to be ratified by the necessary 3/4ths of States (38). Obviously, only proposed Amendments that are likely to pass both Houses of the legislatures of thirty-eight (38) States, that is, the required 3/4ths of States to ratify an Amendment to the Constitution should be proposed. See the Final Report here. The purpose in a Convention of States, simulated or real, is to PROPOSE AMENDMENTS that give power back to the People. The proposed amendments must reflect the thinking, objectives — the goals of people of States — who want to restore our Constitutional Republic to one that represents the people.

ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!

ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!

ARTICLE V Convention of States—Restore the Appropriate Balance!

A real CoS, requires that 2/3rds of States (34) send an "application" to CONgress requesting that CONgress schedule a CoS. State Legislatures are composed of an Assembly and Senate. Each "house" must pass a bill separately and send the resolution to their Governor. Then the State sends an "application" to the CONgress. When the federal CONgress receives applications from 34 States, the CONgress is required to set a date for the Convention of States. CONgress is NOT involved otherwise. The States have the Convention, propose amendments, and dispatch the precisely worded amendments to their respectives assemblies and senates for ratification. CONgress only schedules the Convention.